Oppose S 384: Genetically modified crops are not the answer

By Dr. Hans Herren and Dr. Marcia Ishii-Eiteman
The Hill

The Senate is considering a bill that would overhaul the way Americans deliver foreign aid. With more people going hungry than ever before, the bill’s attention to global hunger could not come at a better time. The Global Food Security Act [S. 384] would streamline the aid process and focus on long-term agricultural development. But something has gone awry inside the bill. A closer look reveals that its otherwise commendable focus may be seriously undermined by a new clause lobbied for by one of America’s largest seed and chemical companies.

This bill includes a mandate that we spend foreign aid dollars developing genetically modified (GM) crops. No other kind of agricultural technology is mentioned. Unsurprisingly, Monsanto has lobbied more frequently on this bill than any other entity.

The trouble with a mandate for GM crops is this: it won’t work. A recent report by the Union of Concerned Scientists demonstrates that GM crops don’t increase crop yields. USAID has already spent millions of taxpayer dollars developing GM crops over the past two decades, without a single success story to show for it, and plenty of failures. A recent, highly touted partnership between USAID and Monsanto to develop a virus-resistant sweet potato in Kenya failed to deliver anything useful for farmers.

After 14 years and $6 million, local varieties vastly outperformed their genetically modified cousins in field trials. Another 10-year USAID project for GM eggplant in India recently met with such outcry — from scientists and Indian farmers alike — that the government put a moratorium on its release. Growing insect resistance to genetically modified cotton and corn shows that the technology is already failing farmers and will continue to fail over the long term. Sadly, today’s GM obsession shows every indication of duplicating the first ill-fated “Green Revolution” that trapped millions of farmers on a pesticide treadmill while devastating the functioning of the ecosystems on which we depend.

Read full post at The Hill

3 responses to “Oppose S 384: Genetically modified crops are not the answer

  1. The only increase seen from GM food is that of the Monsanto profits.

  2. Wow!!!

    I have only recently started to research global agriculture and the business that goes with it. Previously I thought Monsanto was the problem for capitalizing and monopolizing GMO, I never realized GMOs (or the Green Revolution at that) could be that dangerous!

    Is there any other reference material, besides the aforementioned report, that I can use in my study that critiques GMOs or the Green Revolution?


    • the most comprehensive collection of research material on the subject, of which I am aware, is Engdahl’s book, Seeds of Destruction.

      but there’s also quite a bit of material on this site, alone. use the search box.

      let your fingers do the walking

What do YOU think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s