Interviews with glyphosate-sprayed people: I. Viviana Peralta

By Dario Aranda
GM Watch

“I always tell people the same thing. I do not know about chemistry, I did not go to university, but I know what my whole family has suffered. They are living proof that agrochemicals are poisons that affect us. To all people who are not familiar with this model of agriculture, I always say the same thing: Do not trust these companies. Reject agrochemicals. Do it for the life of your children.”

Viviana Peralta is a housewife and mother from San Jorge, Santa Fe province, Argentina. She is the instigator of a lawsuit that achieved a favorable ruling and is the first of its kind in the country. The ruling limits glyphosate and agrochemicals spraying up to 1,500 meters from houses, implements the precautionary principle (given the possibility of injury, protective measures should be taken) and reverses the burden of proof. Victims no longer have to prove how harmful the agrochemicals are. Instead, agrochemicals companies and the Government now have to prove the safety of these products.[1]

“It happened just a few weeks after my daughter Ailen was born. They started spraying nearby fields. I was sick every other day. At the hospital, they would tell me I was intoxicated or that I had allergies or respiratory problems. One day, they sprayed from dawn till night. That day my baby turned blue. I ran to the hospital, I thought she was dying. When I saw my baby like that, I said, ‘Enough. This cannot go on.’

“I decided to work together with the NGO Centre for the Protection of Nature (Cepronat) and present a request for federal protection. Judge Tristan Martinez ordered the suspension of spraying in our neighborhood, just outside the town of San Jorge (province of Santa Fe, the heart of soybean cultivation). We always say we are not against soy producers – we are simply caring for our children. And everyone here knows, when they spray, the kids suffer a lot. Despite this clarification, we were constantly threatened because it is a big business and the ruling affected economic interests. We based our request on Article 41 of the Constitution, which states that all citizens have the right to enjoy a healthy and balanced environment, fit for human development and that business activities must not compromise the health of future generations. Fortunately, the judge favored public health over an economic activity.

“In spite of this, soy producers and the provincial government appealed the judge’s decision. The evidence was strong though and in December 2009, the court of second instance ruled in favor of us once again. It was the first time in the history of the country that a ruling like this one was appealed and ruled again in favor of those of us affected by agrochemical spraying. Not only that, but the Court ordered the Government of Santa Fe and the Universidad Nacional del Litoral (UNL) to prove that agrochemicals are not harmful to public health. For the first time, the burden of proof is reversed. It will not be us trying to prove the consequences – especially because we have no financial means to perform scientific studies. Ever since the banning of the glyphosate spraying, our kids don’t get sick anymore. There aren’t any respiratory problems. We are happy.

Read full post at GM Watch

5 responses to “Interviews with glyphosate-sprayed people: I. Viviana Peralta

  1. This sort of thing is especially true in a small rural community. Its like you gotta keep your mouth shut or the whole community suffers.. and if you say anything or go to authorities, the community point the finger at the whistle blower.

    • yeah, they’ve got a real battle going on there. we just posted an article about an organized attack on those folks – 100 thugs bore down on a group of farmers who had gathered to hear scientific info about glyphosate toxicity.

      100! and the local police were among the perpetrators.

      gotta wonder if Monsanto or some other biotech-pesticide firm paid for that to be done.

  2. Monsanto Roundup
    Groundbreaking study shows Roundup link to birth defects
    International scientists confirm dangers of Roundup at GMO-Free Regions Conference in Brussels, Brussels 16 September 2010
    Glyphosate, causes malformations in frog and chicken embryos at doses far lower than those used in agricultural spraying and well below maximum residue levels in products presently approved in the European Union. (1) published by a group around Professor Andrés Carrasco, director of the Laboratory of Molecular Embryology at the University of Buenos Aires Medical School and member of Argentina’s National Council of Scientific and Technical Research.

    In 2002, French scientists found that Roundup activates one of the key stages of cellular division that can potentially lead to cancer. There is also research that shows that even brief exposure to glyphosate causes liver damage in rats. The research indicated that glyphosate acted in synergy with the surfactant used in Roundup to increase damage to the liver.

  3. charmaine calvert

    Thanks for the valuable information. I pass your articles on because I believe the more we know the better we can deal with big business and it’s selfish agenda of making money at any cost. I am incensed by the sly ways of companies like Monsanto, who by their lies and deceit, have virtually robbed us of the choice to eat non engineered and modified foods. People still think that buying organic means non GM/GE. That just isn’t so, all it means is the seeds have been grown under organic conditions and it’s not guaranteed that those seeds haven’t come indirectly from Monsanto themselves. The reactions to these food stuffs by animals ( in very short lab trials) speaks volumes, only unlike the animals, most of the humans on this planet aren’t smart enough to refuse the frankenfoods.

  4. I am beginning to think the global threat is going to be control of our food first, before the climate gets us. PErcy Schmeiser of Canada has a long tale to tell of fighting Monsanto on their GMO rapeseed/canola. You can find the interview in the archives, although I think it was on or about the 17 Sept. 2010. This has got to stop!!

What do YOU think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s