Death of Gene Patents?

By Dr. Mae-Wan Ho
Institute of Science in Society

It took more than a decade to expose this legal monstrosity; all patents on DNA sequences natural or synthetic should be banned on the ground that they usurp the ‘laws of nature’ embodied in the DNA coding mechanisms that have evolved through billions of years of evolution.

US Government rejects gene patents

The US federal government dropped a bombshell on 29 October 2010 when it reversed a longstanding policy. It said that patents should not be granted for genomic DNA as it is a product of nature even when isolated from the organism [1]. However, recombinant DNA, or new combinations for DNA for making genetically modified organisms, or gene therapy, or ‘synthetic life’ (see [2] Synthetic Life? Not By a Long Shot, I-SiS 47) remain patentable.

The opinion was expressed in the amicus (friend of the court) brief from the Justice Department in response to the ongoing legal battle over US patents for the breast and ovarian cancer-predisposing genes BRCA1 and BRCA1.

“The chemical structure of native human genes is a product of nature, and it is no less a product of nature when that structure is ‘isolated’ from its natural environment than are cotton fibers that have been separated from cotton seeds or coal that has been extracted from the earth…

“We acknowledge that this conclusion is contrary to the longstanding practice of the Patent and Trademark Office, as well as the practice of the National Institutes of Health and other government agencies that have in the past sought and obtained patents for isolated genomic DNA,” the brief said.

Is this a major reversal of policy?

“It’s major when the United States, in a filing, reverses decades of policies on an issue that everyone has been focused on for so long,” said Edward Reines, a patent attorney who represents biotechnology companies.

Dr. James P. Evans, a professor of genetics and medicine at the University of North Carolina and head of a government advisory task force on gene patents, referred to the government’s brief “a bit of a landmark, kind of a line in the sand.” He pointed out that although gene patents had been issued for decades, the patentability of genes had never been examined in court.

As of 2010 approximately 40 000 US patents exist that relate to an estimated 2,000 human genes, or about 20 percent of the human genome [3]. Patents have been issued for isolated genes, methods of using the isolated genes, and methods to diagnose a disease based on an association between a gene and a disease.

Read full post at Institute of Science in Society

5 responses to “Death of Gene Patents?

  1. Yes, BAN gene patents. Playing God for profit ought to be a crime.

  2. charmaine calvert

    Well this is going to be tricky. Since America doesn’t recognise the International court in the Hague, some other way will have to be found to stop the patenting of DNA globally. The US courts can only stop this in country but the precident has been set and the door opened for the rest of the world. I believe there have been patents awarded in the EU. What will happen to the 20% already in private hands I wonder?

  3. Pingback: Links 11/13/10 « naked capitalism

  4. Really helpfull blog, thanks

  5. I always hold onto the hope that someday all gene patents will be banned. The Medical Mafia doesn’t seem to understand that genetic disease only makes up less than 5% of all disease if even that. Not only that but the medical mafia should never have access to our genes because they can pretty much tell us whatever they want to make more money.

What do YOU think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s