S.510 summaries from around the web

By Rady Ananda
Food Freedom

Various organizations have posted their analysis of what the impact would be from S. 510, the Food Safety Modernization Act, which was moved out of committee yesterday, for a full vote by January 17, 2011. Drawing only from those which oppose S. 510, below are summaries of some of those analyses, along with a link to contact your Senators:

Senator Tom Coburn, MD (Oklahoma), “Detailed Concerns

Expense: The total cost of the bill is over $1.6 billion over 5 years. Of these costs, $335 million are for non-FDA programs.

Bureaucratic Expansion: There is already significant overlap in food safety activities conducted by the USDA, FDA, EPA, and National Marine Fisheries Service [and Fish & Wildlife Service], leading to ineffective implementation.

Burdensome New Regulations: Many provisions give FDA sweeping authority with significant consequences: performance standards, record-keeping, food-specific production standards, and overly-punitive measures, along with new fees, all work together to overly burden the small producer.

The bill “doesn’t fix the true underlying problem.”

Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund:

S.510 presents a major threat to

  • the local food movement,
  • States’ autonomy to regulate food, and
  • America’s ability to be self-sufficient in food production.

S.510 will significantly increase the power of FDA, an agency which has stated on public record that the American people have no ”fundamental right to their own bodily and physical health” and “do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish”.

FDA’s failure to exercise its current powers hardly justifies rewarding the agency with expanded authority in the aftermath of the egg recall and peanut butter fiasco.

Moreover, FDA has proven itself untrustworthy to operate in the best interest of the American public as seen in allowing the non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in animals and its lax policy regarding genetically modified foods.

Solve the real food safety problems–the centralized food distribution system and imported foods–and not regulate our local food sources out of business.

Activist Post:

Today, the Associated Press put out some world-class propaganda claiming that “Some small farms would be exempt from government efforts to prevent foodborne illness under a Senate agreement on food safety legislation.”  The article claims a last-minute deal was struck to allow small farms to “avoid expensive food safety plans”:

“The agreement brokered by [Jon Tester of Montana] would allow farmers who make less than $500,000 a year in revenue and sell directly to consumers, restaurants or grocery stores within their states or within 275 miles of their farms to avoid expensive food safety plans required of larger operations.”

That all sounds well and good, but it only exempts them from having to submit food safety plans, not from inspections that they get billed for, licensing requirements with expensive quality controls, product confiscation without cause or recourse, and even armed raids.  We’ve already seen all of these ugly faces of food fascism unfold in America, from armed raids to product seizure, though no one had become ill.

The bill essentially transfers authority over food regulation enforcement from the FDA to the Department of Homeland Security who brought us the liberty-killing, child-molesting TSA.

Finally, this bill will do nothing to protect the public from foodborne diseases, because it does nothing to fundamentally change the factory food production methods that allow them to fester.

National Health Freedom Action:

►S.510 is dangerously broad without proper checks to prevent abuse of power;

►It imposes a one-size-fits-all set of regulations that would drastically burden, to extinction, basic natural and organic food suppliers, thus endangering the lives of Americans who depend on local wholesome foods;

►It does not address the real causes of food safety issues stemming from the industrialized food supply chain; and

►It ensures that international trade agreements have supremacy over local laws.

Tea Party Patriots call S. 510 “Dangerous Intrusions: First the TSA and now the FDA.”


Go to www.farmtoconsumer.org/stopS510 to use the online Reject S.510 petition to send a live email to your Legislators and local newspaper editor.

Tell your Senators to protect local foods and vote against S.510.

16 responses to “S.510 summaries from around the web

  1. Pingback: Senate Bill 510: Creating a Nation of Dependence » Musicians for Freedom

  2. As of yesterday, the Food Safety bill now includes the Tester amendment, which specifically excludes small farms that sell directly to consumers. Because of this change, Big Agriculture is now fighting the food safety bill. With that revision in place, folks who want to preserve local growers and the right of consumers to buy from them really ought to “plow in” their support, to make things better for all consumers and independent farmers.


    • that’s because those greedy bastards don’t want to give up an inch. This bill will destroy small, local producers and the Tester Amendment gives them a tiny bit of wiggle room.

      The Tester Amendment does not go far enough, but apparently enuf to bother Big Food.

      Trash S 510 — that’s the only amendment worth fighting for

  3. Very useful summary Rady! thanks

  4. just got word from Mike Adams that the bill is set for a vote Nov. 29 – most likely, but debate may delay it.

  5. How dare they outlaw real food! They just want us to end up diseased, fat, and drugged-up like them! Which ironically was caused by eating processed industrial foods.

  6. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » Food Freedom | Decentralize, Grow Your Own, Buy Local.

  7. After watching Food, Inc. we’ve changed our eating habits and now this? I’m posting this link everywhere I can find potential listeners.

  8. if you want to see just what the goverment’s idea of a “good diet” is look at the american military, all canned vegtables, nothing fresh, ever. overly proccesed meats shipped from god knows where, kept in poorly kept, dirty freezers, right next to the rat trps, and cooked with so much salt and pepper that you cant even tell what kind of meat its supoosed to be, and the only resturants on post are burgerking and poppyes.

  9. Pingback: November 24, 2010 « Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?

  10. Pingback: The Food Safety Modernization Act: The US Government’s Assault on “Food Freedom” | War On You: Breaking Alternative News

  11. Pingback: Tester Amendment to Food “Safety” Bill: Lipstick on a Pig « Bear Market News

  12. Pingback: The Food Safety Modernization Act: The US Government’s Assault on "Food Freedom" | The Crotch Shot Radio Show

  13. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » Like the Patriot Act? You’re gonna love the Food Safety Modernization Act | Food Freedom

  14. Pingback: Tester Amendment to food ‘safety’ bill puts lipstick on a pig | War On You: Breaking Alternative News

What do YOU think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s