The cost-effective way to feed the world

By Margaret Mellon and Doug Gurian-Sherman
McClatchy

By 2050, the world will have to feed 9 billion people, adapt to climate change, reduce agricultural pollution, and protect fresh water supplies – all at the same time. Given that formidable challenge, what are the quickest, most cost-effective ways to develop more productive, drought-, flood- and pest-resistant crops?

Some will claim that genetically engineered (GE) crops are the solution. But when compared side-by-side, classical plant breeding bests genetic engineering. Coupled with ecologically based management methods that reduce the environmental harm of crop production, classical breeding could go a long way toward producing the food we will need by mid-century.

Producing better crops faster certainly would help the world feed itself, but genetic engineering has no advantage on that score. Not only can classical breeding programs introduce new varieties about as fast as genetic engineering, technical improvements are making classical practices even faster.

Early steps in the genetic engineering process avoid the multiple rounds of cross-breeding inherent in classical plant breeding by directly inserting engineered genes into the crop. But seed companies then use classical breeding to transfer engineered genes to the crop’s numerous varieties for different markets and climates – and that takes time. And just as in classical breeding, new engineered varieties must be tested in the field for several years to ensure they perform as expected.

Second, GE crops are significantly more expensive to develop. Industry estimates of the cost of developing a single GE trait are in excess of $100 million. By contrast, a classical breeding program for similar traits typically costs about $1 million. Most of the cost differential is attributable to GE crops’ research and development requirements, which include DNA synthesizers and sequencers and other expensive equipment, in addition to classical breeding facilities.

Genetic engineering might be worth the extra cost if classical breeding were unable to impart such desirable traits as drought-, flood- and pest-resistance, and fertilizer efficiency. But in case after case, classical breeding is delivering the goods.

Read more at McClatchy

4 responses to “The cost-effective way to feed the world

  1. Excellent article

    Doc Blake

  2. Farm management is a cost-effective way to feed the world. In addition, better farm management is responsible for yield increases for soybeans and most of the yield increases for corn in the United States. Good farm management and good quality management goes hand in hand. If you make use of the best technology available, keep your standards high, and keep up to date on the latest trends, it is much easier to stay profitable, even during a tight economy. That is why it is vital to make sure you have the best resources available, and Agriculture.com is definitely one of them. They have the latest news, updates, and reports for farmers and other agricultural businesses, including information on farm management. Though I may work for them, I have worked in the field of agriculture for years and have yet to find another resource that can compare to them. They honestly offer a lot great information there, as well as the chance to interact in their forums, share stories, promote my business, and buy or sell products and services. Check it out.

  3. “Breeding” and genetic engineering are not alternate paths to the same goal – genetic engineering is one (of many) specific approaches utilized IN plant breeding (and most of the costs associated with it are due to regulatory burden, not lab supplies).

    But yes, public sector funding of plant breeding should be increased, and it shouldn’t be tied to any one specific approach or technology.

What do YOU think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s