Does the New ‘White House Rural Council’ Equate to UN’s Agenda 21?

By Mike Opelka
The Blaze

On June 9, 2011, President Obama signed Executive Order 13575, Establishment of the White House Rural Council, with goals to take complete control of public lands and rural areas for development. This aligns with the purposes of Agenda 21, a United Nations environment and development program that removes local say in how lands and farms are managed. “Virtually every aspect of rural life seems to now be part of the government’s mission,” writes Mike Opelka. ~Ed.

On June 9, 2011, President Obama signed his 86th Executive Order, and almost nobody noticed.

(For the record, Obama is on par to match President Bush’s 291 orders executed during his two terms in office. The National Archives defines an Executive Order this way: Executive orders are official documents, numbered consecutively, through which the President of the United States manages the operations of the Federal Government.)

President Obama’s E.O. 13575 is designed to begin taking control over almost all aspects of the lives of 16% of the American people. Why didn’t we notice it?  Weinergate.  In the middle of the Anthony Weiner scandal, as the press and most of the American people were distracted, President Obama created something called “The White House Rural Council” (WHRC).

Section One of 13575 states the following:

Section 1. Policy. Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead. These communities supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. Though rural communities face numerous challenges, they also present enormous economic potential. The Federal Government has an important role to play in order to expand access to the capital necessary for economic growth, promote innovation, improve access to health care and education, and expand outdoor recreational activities on public lands.

Warning bells should have been sounding all across rural America when the phrase “sustainable rural communities” came up.  As we know from researching the UN plan for Sustainable Development known as Agenda 21, these are code words for the true fundamental transformation of America.

The third sentence also makes it quite clear that the government intends to take greater control over “food, fiber, and energy.”

The last sentence in Section 1 further clarifies the intent of the order by tying together “access to the capital necessary for economic growth, health care and education.”

The new White House Rural Council will probably be populated by experts in the various fields that might prove helpful to the folks who live and work outside of large urban areas, right?  Well, Tom Vilsack, the current Secretary of Agriculture, will chair the group, but let us review the list of members appointed to serve on this new council – according to the order, the heads of the following groups have been appointed:

  • (1) the Department of the Treasury; Timothy Geithner
  • (2) the Department of Defense; Robert Gates
  • (3) the Department of Justice; Eric Holder
  • (4) the Department of the Interior; Ken Salazar
  • (5) the Department of Commerce; Gary Locke
  • (6) the Department of Labor; Hilda Solis
  • (7) the Department of Health and Human Services; Kathleen Sebelius
  • (8) the Department of Housing and Urban Development; Shaun Donovan
  • (9) the Department of Transportation; Ray LaHood
  • (10) the Department of Energy; Dr. Steven Chu
  • (11) the Department of Education; Arne Duncan
  • (12) the Department of Veterans Affairs; Eric Shinseki
  • (13) the Department of Homeland Security; Janet Napolitano
  • (14) the Environmental Protection Agency; Lisa Jackson
  • (15) the Federal Communications Commission; Michael Copps
  • (16) the Office of Management and Budget; Peter Orszag
  • (17) the Office of Science and Technology Policy; John Holdren
  • (18) the Office of National Drug Control Policy; R. Gil Kerlikowske
  • (19) the Council of Economic Advisers; Austan Goolsbee
  • (20) the Domestic Policy Council; Melody Barnes (former VP at Center for American Progress)
  • (21) the National Economic Council; Gene B. Sperling
  • (22) the Small Business Administration; Karen Mills
  • (23) the Council on Environmental Quality; Nancy Sutley
  • (24) the White House Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs; Valerie Jarrett
  • (25) the White House Office of Cabinet Affairs; and such other executive branch departments, agencies, and offices as the President or Secretary of  Agriculture may, from time to time, designate. Chris Lu (or virtually anyone to be designated by the 24 people named above)

It appears that not a single department in the federal government was excluded from the new White House Rural Council, and the wild card option in number 25 gives the president and the agriculture secretary the option to designate anyone to serve on this powerful council.

Within the twenty-five designated members of the council are some curious ties to Agenda 21 and the structure being built to implement it:

Read more at The Blaze


H/T Blacklisted News.

For more background on Agenda 21, see Geology Professor Eric T. Karlstrom’s piece, Green Global Dictatorship: Regional Governance, UN Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, and the Wildlands Project (n.d. circa 2008)

Also see: Feds buying up farmland they flooded; Soros in on it

22 responses to “Does the New ‘White House Rural Council’ Equate to UN’s Agenda 21?

  1. It appears this will be implemented in part through land-grant universities, extension offices and favored non-profits. More permits and licenses and boards.

  2. Rural Cleansing– this has been called

  3. Three days ago, I apprised my network friends re’ this hegenomic ukase to usurp control of the major food source in America. I dubbed the subject as: ‘NIOT’ (Not In Our Town).

  4. As a resident of rural Amerika, they can take Agenda 21 and its associated programs and shove them where the sun don’t shine. Guess I will have to buy the Don’t Tread on Me flag after all…fucking Fascists.

    • They are Not Fascists.
      They are Bolsheviks.

      The Germans never starved anyone, Russian Bolsheviks Jews did.
      About 66 Million Christians, if you read your history.

      Germans never disarmed the citizens (Except the group that openly declared an International Boycott), but Russians did.

      • The Germans (or Nazis rather!) weren’t fascists. The Nazis were left wing socialists opposed to internationalism. What this government is moving toward is FASCISM. The pillars of fascism are corporate control of government, a one party system which we are getting with these Republicrats, and the necessity for an “other” which in this case has been the Muslims,

  5. Oh, and P.S.: “sustainable” and “development” in the same breath is an Oxymoron.

  6. Government policies with doublespeak like this depend upon sheep—people and administrators who think they are good citizens–to work on the frontlines processing and enforcing all the paperwork and “policies” of so-called “sustainable development”–believing with all their might what they do is right because they have “JOBS”– never considering with their hearts or imaginations how the common good of freedom, health and happiness is being destroyed–or that a small farmer should have the right and wits to think and produce for himself.

  7. Bill – you can keep your anti-Semite ass outta here, or should I come and blow it off for you?

  8. Pingback: The Truth Or The Fight » Blog Archive » Feds buying up farmland they flooded; Soros in on it

  9. Pingback: Feds buying up farmland they flooded; Soros in on it | War On You: Breaking Alternative News

  10. Pingback: Feds buying up farmland they flooded; Soros in on it » The Original N-D-N's Blog

  11. Pingback: CFRG Conspiracy Blog – Feds buying up farmland they flooded; Soros in on it

  12. Pingback: Feds Buying Up Farmland They Flooded; Soros In On It : « 2012 Indy Info

  13. Pingback: Dwie pieczenie na jednym ogniu,Soros i Obama, niszczą wolnych farmerów.Feds Buying Up Farmland They Flooded; Soros In On It « Zenobiusz's Blog

  14. Pingback: … Anyone know IF these accusations are valid…? « Authentically Wired

  15. I find it troubling that the Tea Party is so against this, Glenn Beck does shows against it, and Fox News doesn’t like it, and they equate it to a UN sustainability program. Sounds like something I would probably like. Don’t know anything about it though, so I guess I’ll just have to study up.

  16. Pingback: Feds buying up farmland they flooded; Soros in on it « Romanticpoet's Weblog

  17. Pingback: Beware of THIS word…..”Sustainability”. Agenda 21 Marches on…. « Romanticpoet's Weblog

  18. Pingback: ANOTHER Reason to GET RID of the U.N. on American Soil……When did the U.S. give up our Sovereignty? « Romanticpoet's Weblog

  19. Pingback: ICLEI….Coming to Your Neighborhood; Might be There NOW. UN and Agenda 21. Control of YOUR City? « Romanticpoet's Weblog

  20. Pingback: UN Agenda 21 - How it effects everyone

What do YOU think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s