Mark of the Beast: Obama’s latest Monsanto pick, Elena Kagan

Monsanto goon Elena Kagan

By Rady Ananda

First, we spit out our coffee over President Obama’s appointments of former Monsanto goon Michael Taylor as Food Safety [sic] Czar and ‘biotech governor of the year’ Tom Vilsack as Secretary of Agriculture. Then we choked on our grits when he made Monsanto lobbyist, Islam Siddiqui, the US Ag Trade Representative. Now, the real food movement has completely lost its appetite with Obama’s nomination of Monsanto defender, Elena Kagan, to the US Supreme Court.

In December 2009, in her capacity as Solicitor General, Kagan intervened in the first case on which SCOTUS will rule involving genetically modified crops, Monsanto v Geertson Seed. She defended Monsanto’s fight to contaminate the environment with its GM alfalfa, not the American people’s right to safe feed and a protected environment. 

The lower court ruled that “contamination of organic and conventional alfalfa crops with the genetically engineered gene has occurred and defendants acknowledge as much. Such contamination is irreparable environmental harm.”

Michael Taylor

That other fields, not those of Geertson Seed, et al., had been contaminated does not bother Kagan. “The district court failed to find either that respondents had suffered or were likely to suffer irreparable harm…”

This flies in the face of reality. The biotech industry has admitted it cannot prevent contamination of natural fields. When Bayer CropScience contaminated nearly a third of the US rice supply with its GM version, its defense lawyers told jurors that “Bayer’s containment protocols were equal to or exceeded industry standards when the test rice escaped into the general supplies.”

Tom Vilsack

If the best containment protocols don’t work, then contamination cannot be prevented. That is clearly an indication that natural crop farmers are “likely to suffer irreparable harm.”

Geertson Seed explains some basic facts about alfalfa and GM contamination:

“Alfalfa is not just a prolific field crop, but feral alfalfa and weedy alfalfa is commonly found beyond the fields by roadways, irrigation canals, backyards and beyond….

“Contamination of conventional alfalfa from genetically engineered alfalfa is a major concern. The primary mode of contamination is from the movement of pollen by bees from plant to plant. Alfalfa is pollinated by many different bees and other insects that fly long distances. Sudden wind gusts like those associated with summer thunder storms can carry pollinators over greater distances. When a pollinator visits an alfalfa plant that has the Roundup Ready (RR) gene inserted, it will pick up the pollen that contains the RR gene and carry it to a distant conventional alfalfa plant. If that pollen fertilizes the blossom of the conventional plant, the resulting seed will contain the RR gene.”

Islam Siddiqui

This contamination becomes especially important because contaminated alfalfa will continue to sprout for years: “The seed produced by alfalfa can have 50% or more dormant seed [which] can lay dormant in the soil for many years.”

Glyphosate is one of the most toxic herbicides in use today. Monsanto’s trade name for it is Roundup. Geertson Seed explains that:

“Roundup Ready alfalfa will have a selective advantage over non GE alfalfa and will become the dominant weed variety. In turn, the weedy Roundup Ready alfalfa will be difficult to kill and will become a source of pollen and seed that will contaminate other feral plants and conventional alfalfa seed fields in the area. In a few years, it will be extremely difficult to avoid contamination from GE alfalfa.”

Worse, researchers at the University of Caen found that Monsanto’s particular formulations of glyphosate in Roundup “actually amplified glyphosate’s toxic effects,” which include human cell death.

Kagan seems to believe that the biotech industry’s inability to prevent contamination is not an issue for farmers, the environment or we the people. Her repugnance toward our human right to reject the deployment of genetically engineered crops comports with corporate views.

She earns the M on her forehead, joining Justice Clarence Thomas, a former Monsanto lawyer who corruptly refused to recuse himself from Monsanto v Geertson Seed.

68 responses to “Mark of the Beast: Obama’s latest Monsanto pick, Elena Kagan

  1. Well, it looks like the deck is stacked against us. The corporation/govt rulers don’t care what we think, they are moving full speed ahead. I am sorry to be so negative, but this reality seems to be so obvious. If I could type this problem away, I might be making some difference. I feel that helpless.

    • they’re criminals, ecoterrorists and enemies of the people.

      it is up to the people to create the society we need and want.

  2. All of Americas Food Crops will Soon Be SCREWED… Plant Your Own Or Die, will be the New Law Of The Land…
    These SOB’s Should be Put up against a wall and Shot! For Crimes Against Humanity…

  3. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » Food Freedom

  4. Rady, thanks for this. They are poisoning our entire food supply. I don’t have enough fingers for all the holes in the dykes/levees that need them.

    They too will be poisoned. I guess they believe their own poisonous lies.

  5. They are poisoning our whole food supply. It will mean the entire planet is poisoned.

    I guess they believe their own lies

    • hey, thanks for your comment and for reading this, Sheila.

      We have a huge fight on our hands trying to save the earth from corporate interests.

      oy, the evil that men do.

  6. Isn’t that the truth, alas

  7. Pingback: USA: Bei Monsanto knallen die Sektkorken… « Ticker

  8. I don’t know what other record Elena Kagan has on these issues, but I wonder if it’s really fair to paint her with the same brush as long-term Monsanto employees, lobbyists, and lawyers. As
    Solicitor General, Ms. Kagan was doing her job. She was representing her clients, which include all departments and agencies under the executive branch, in this case APHIS.

    Her personal position is irrelevant. Obama’s personal position is irrelevant. What is relevant is the extent to which these policies and alliances have become entrenched across administrations and political parties.

    IMO the only constructive way out is to engage in a civil manner. We need to at least give some benefit of the doubt that there are honest brokers in Washington and in the Administration, and that they may be moved by our honest and impassioned appeals for rationality and fairness, even if only out of enlightened self-interest.

    It is also important to shed light on these sorts of public-private relationships and potential conflicts of interest. But I don’t think this kind of vilification will help the cause.

    • As Solicitor General, Kagan’s job is to defend those of Acts of Congress which are constitutional.

      She is supposed to represent the people, not corporate interests.

      As to her other positions, she agrees with Bush and Obama that suspects can lose their habeas corpus rights, e.g. indefinite detention without trial.

      She is an abomination to freedom along with the rest of the goons in government who continue to support the Patriot Act, kidnapping, torture, assassinating citizens, ad nauseum.

      Actually, I was pretty nice to her in this piece since I didn’t get into all these other problems with her.

      • Technically we’re both right. She is to defend the legal position of any branch of the federal government. Since the federal government (via an authorized agency) ruled that the GM seeds did not constitute a likelihood of irreparable harm, she was duty-bound to defend that position. I don’t like it any more than you do, but that is the reality.

        To sum up a lot of my feelings about federal policy: disappointing, but not surprising.

        Nonetheless, making a sane, civil, and rational case to the public and to government officials seems to me the most constructive course of action. I grant that outrage has it’s place, but we have to have more. If not Kagan, than whom? Would a truly progressive nominee stand a chance of confirmation?

      • In other words, the beef should be with USDA/APHIS rather than with Kagan.

        • nah, I’ve read too many pundits who say she is moving the Court to the right; the last thing we need. (By ‘right’ I mean paternalistic authoritarianism, i.e. Big Bro tells us how to manage every aspect of our life, as if we are children incapable of caring for ourselves without government interference.)

          She should be blasted on every single front where she offends the basic principles of freedom, including freedom from monopolies.

          Seriously — she rejects the 800-year old habeas corpus!!! Are you kidding me, Jim? She supports tyranny.

          She’s a corporatist, thru and thru, and tossed her hat in with them when she chose to defend Monsanto instead Geertson Seed. She could have defended NEPA by supporting Geertson, but chose Monsanto.

          She’s one of the devils and we’re not gonna give her a pass.

      • But realistically, pro-GM has been the bipartisan agenda in Washington for nearly 20 years, so why would the SG suddenly argue against it?

        Lincoln and FDR also suspended HC in wartime, so it’s not like there’s no precedent, and it’s not the same as “supporting tyranny.” I don’t agree with her stance on GM or HC, and I would like to see a different nominee put forth, but the horse has left the barn, and Rebublicans in the Senate are her biggest obstacle now.

        Maybe my main objection is to labels like “goon,” “devil” and “beast.” Other than that your post deals with the issues and is quite informative. I just don’t think the labels are constructive if you want your position to be taken seriously in the greater political realm.

        But then I’m interested in sharing ideas, fostering mutual understanding, and finding creative solutions rather than raising my hands in despair.

    • ha! It’s all about money and power. You mustn’t know yourself or people in general. Civil???
      What the people in power (our public servants–HA!!!!) protecting this
      kind of behavior of the Bigs who want us not even to be able to grow our own food.
      Wake up!
      this isn’t civil–its really an intensification of the original war!
      To destroy man, make him null and void
      with “toxic food” that they are “developing”. (Watch Food Inc. dude)
      This Food is designed for malnourishment and killing by slow death.
      There needs to be people elected that won’t cowtow to the machine–not dems or repubs
      but honest as you say enlightened folks. Even the sleaze bags in my city that are self serving are the ones in local politics
      and when an honest person tries and gets elected the paper and TV paint him or her out to be a bad guy while there cronies try to steal billions on hush hush “development deals”
      Seen this first hand–several times. And beyond local govt. least we know since Kennedy No potus has the will to stand up against it–or the integrity. There’s too much money in it!
      If you’re really not just a partisan ass kisser for the “leftright” or a paid blogger for Monsanto then you’ll have to admit that to yourself.

      • JimtoJim,

        I’ve appreciate what you’re saying. I’ve seen Food Inc. Not much in it I haven’t known for 10 years. Not so sure about the mission to “destroy man.” Control, yes. Nothing new there. It’s always been all about the money. No need for a conspiracy theory when greed and shortsightededness explain it so well. The only thing that stands up to the money is righteous resistance, ala Ghandi, King, Mandela. We’re all grasping for ways to get the message out, and I feel it’s possible, maybe even necessary, to do so in a way that doesn’t scream “wingnut!” But to each their own.

        Namaste,
        Jim

  9. Miss American

    Mr. Brewster, How calm would you stay if someone drop a poison pill in your drink right now??? “Well, I’ll drink this for now, then drop a note in the mail to my Senator later”? I’m sorry folks, but we all have our limit. Out of ALL the horrible things that have, and are, being done to us and our country, THIS ISSUE sends me totally over the edge! How can ANYBODY with half a brain not see and know that GM foods are DANGEROUS to us now and the earth for the future???????? Mad scientists have taken over. It’s so unbelievable!! They think they can mess with Mother Nature, the perfectly created ecosystem, and NOTHING bad happens?? It sends shivers down my spine!
    Check newly released research from Russia:

    http://www.responsibletechnology.org/utility/showArticle/?objectID=4888#hair

    http://www.responsibletechnology.org/utility/showArticle/?objectID=299

    • Okay, Miss American, what’s your proposal? How are you going to get the powerful people to notice?

      To answer your first question, staying calm keeps me sane. I do what I can, try to avoid processed food, try to get the word out, and hope this gets reined in before we have to send the Army out to pull up rogue GM soybeans. Already the number of glyphosate resistant weeds is threatening to render Roundup-ready crops obsolete. Bt resistant insects will probably show up soon.

  10. I also find it interesting that Geertson’s main objection to RRA was that glyphosate is the preferred method for killing alfalfa (i.e. for rotation purposes), and that is not an option with RRA.

  11. Pingback: SCOTUS lifts partial ban on GM alfalfa in Monsanto v Geertson Seed « COTO Report

  12. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » SCOTUS lifts partial ban on GM alfalfa in Monsanto v Geertson Seed « Food Freedom

  13. Pingback: US Supreme Court Lifts Partial Ban on Monsanto’s GM Alfalfa «

  14. Pingback: Criminalizing Nature’s Most Perfect Food: FDA’s war on private food contracts | COTO Report

  15. Pingback: Criminalizing Nature’s Most Perfect Food: FDA’s war on private food contracts | War On You: Breaking Alternative News

  16. Pingback: Criminalizing Nature’s Most Perfect Food: FDA’s war on private food contracts :

  17. Pingback: Criminalizing Nature’s Most Perfect Food: FDA’s war on private food contracts «

  18. Pingback: Criminalizing Nature’s Most Perfect Food: FDA’s war on private food contracts : NOVAKEO.COM – The Radically Alternative Webzine

  19. Pingback: Global Research Review: The Raw Milk Revolution : Chelsea Green

  20. Pingback: BlackListed News | The Ruthless Truth blog

  21. Pingback: November 24, 2010 « Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?

  22. Pingback: The Food Safety Modernization Act: The US Government’s Assault on “Food Freedom” | War On You: Breaking Alternative News

  23. Pingback: The Food Safety Modernization Act: The US Government’s Assault on "Food Freedom" | The Crotch Shot Radio Show

  24. Pingback: Tester Amendment to food ‘safety’ bill puts lipstick on a pig | War On You: Breaking Alternative News

  25. Pingback: Patriot Act for Food: A close look at bizarre propaganda for S.510 | COTO Report

  26. Pingback: Patriot Act for Food: A Close Look At Bizarre Propaganda for S.510 :

  27. Pingback: Welcome to the Food Wars: Patriot Act for Food – A close look at bizarre propaganda for S.510 – Rady Ananda | Dprogram.net

  28. Pingback: S.510, the Patriot Act for Food, to be voted on today | Truth Is Scary

  29. Pingback: “Unconstitutional” food bill driven by Big Food lobby dollars | COTO Report

  30. Pingback: “Unconstitutional” food bill driven by Big Food lobby dollars – Rady Ananda | Dprogram.net

  31. Pingback: looks like tanning isn't the only thing being banned. now your locally grown food! - TanToday - Tanning Salon Business Forum

  32. Pingback: “Unconstitutional” Food Bill Driven By Big Food Lobby Dollars

  33. Pingback: Clarence Thomas Faces Call for Disbarment | COTO Report

  34. Pingback: A Perfect Storm of GMOs, Chemicals and Cancer | COTO Report

  35. Pingback: A Perfect Storm of GMOs, Chemicals and Cancer | ClipsNewsNetwork

  36. Pingback: A Perfect Storm of GMOs, Chemicals and Cancer | Patriotpainter's Blog

  37. Pingback: A Perfect Storm of GMOs, Chemicals and Cancer : NOVAKEO.COM – Independent Journalism for the Independent Mind

  38. Pingback: Natural Health Care vs. Big Corporations

  39. Pingback: A Perfect Storm of GMOs, Chemicals, and Cancer | Dissident Voice

  40. Pingback: Uncle Sam Food History Exhibit Promotes Food Control :

  41. Pingback: Uncle Sam Food History Exhibit Promotes Food Control : – food and health

  42. Pingback: Tyranny of the Agri Culture and the Judicial systems. « THE INTERNET POST

  43. Pingback: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm | The Global Realm

  44. Pingback: Food Rights, Gene Rights and Monsanto: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm - We Are Change Seattle

  45. Pingback: No food, gene rights say Monsanto: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm « Organic News Net

  46. Pingback: No food, gene rights say Monsanto: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm

  47. Pingback: No food, gene rights say Monsanto: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm - TaJnB | TheAverageJoeNewsBlogg

  48. Pingback: Food Rights, Gene Rights and Monsanto: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm | Sovereign Independent

  49. Pingback: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge Quits to Work for Monsanto Law Firm :

  50. Pingback: Food Rights, Gene Rights and Monsanto : Veracity Voice

  51. Pingback: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm

  52. Pingback: More on Nasty GMO’s & Scumbag Monsanto | The TRUTH will set you FREE

  53. Pingback: Criminalizing Nature’s Most Perfect Food: FDA’s war on private food contracts | Food Freedom News

  54. Pingback: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm - Infowars Ireland

  55. Pingback: A Perfect Storm of GMOs, Chemicals and Cancer - Infowars Ireland

  56. Pingback: Genetically Modified Crops, Monsanto’s Roundup and the Contamination of America’s Food Chain | The Falling Darkness

  57. Although maximum site owners are familiar with these concepts, but they may lack the expertise
    to do it the correctly. Today, lots of websites and blogs
    bring in unheard of income for their owners merely by promoting another’s company on their web pages.
    Daily, even hourly, businesses can see how many individuals clicked on their ads and
    the traffic that is being driven to their website.

  58. They are a very good way to promote business service. Advertisers
    all over the place, advertising everything underneath the sun.
    Make certain that the payment gateway you are making use of, permits similar languages as the
    remaining of the web pages so that they can match well together.

What do YOU think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s