Bayer and Death: Vaccines and CDC’s Myth of a 1918 Virus

Part 3 of 5

By J. Holcombe, D. Jacobson, and T. Ruhl

“The bird and mammalian species took hold on the earth approximately 65 million years ago, i.e. the same time as the dinosaurs went extinct. So did the flu and other viruses of all the surviving species. Since then, all those viruses have been mating and mutating among themselves without the sky caving in due to any infection. Therefore, any talk of a bird or swine flu pandemic with the probability to kill millions of people is either a purposeful or hallucinogenic nonsense to make profit on the backs of the innocent following.”
~Shiv Chopra, microbiologist, vaccine expert

In 2005, the Centers for Disease Control claimed it had reconstructed the “virulent” 1918 virus:

“CDC researchers and their colleagues have successfully reconstructed the influenza virus that caused the 1918-19 flu pandemic, which killed as many as 50 million people worldwide.”

Whatever the CDC reconstructed, it was not what killed millions of people in 1918-19.

The CDC appears unaware that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has proven that it was not a virus or flu, but a common upper respiratory bacteria that was transformed into massive infection and then deadly pneumonias by the immune suppressing effect of aspirin.

Aspirin killed people, not a virus.

In 1918, the convergence of a toxic drug, massive corporate advertising, and government, military and medical pressure to use the drug, led to tens of millions of deaths.  That combination of groups has come together again, this time behind vaccines.

The question, though, is why are vaccines being promoted at all for a pandemic “like the 1918 flu” since the deaths then were not caused by a flu?

Given that it was common bacteria, the following CDC statements make no sense:

“This report describes the successful reconstruction of the influenza A (H1N1) virus responsible for the 1918 “Spanish flu” pandemic and provides novel information about the properties that contributed to its exceptional virulence….

“The influenza pandemic of 1918-19 killed an estimated 20 to 50 million people worldwide, many more than the subsequent pandemics of the 20th century. The biological properties that confer virulence to pandemic influenza viruses were poorly understood.  Research to better understand how the individual genes of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus contribute to the disease process could provide important insights into the basis of virulence.”

The CDC is putting out a view of the 1918 deaths which is a complete science fiction. It doesn’t fit with either historical or biologic data.  Nor does their “virulent virus” view answer the lingering questions around 1918 – such as why young people died or why people died so quickly.  Both are answered by Dr. Karen Starko’s work on aspirin use and overdose during 1918.

Though no virus was responsible for the deaths, the CDC has another problem.  There has been no evidence showing the reconstruction of the virus, either.  German virologist Stefan Lanka points to the source of the story on reconstruction and to missing pieces in the virus, in this 2005 interview:

“Dr Jeffery Taubenberger, from whom the allegation of a reconstruction of the 1918 pandemic virus originates, works for the US-American army and has worked for more than 10 years on producing, on the basis of samples from different human corpses, short pieces of gene substance by means of the biochemical multiplication technique PCR. Out of the multitude of produced pieces he has selected those which came closest to the model of the genetic substance of the idea of an influenza virus, and has published these.

“In no corpse however was a virus seen or isolated or was a piece of gene substance from a such isolated. By means of the PCR technique there were produced out of nothing pieces of gene substance whose earlier existence in the corpse could not be demonstrated.

“If viruses had been present, then these could have been isolated, and out of them their gene substance could have been isolated too; there would have been no necessity for anyone to produce laboriously, by means of PCR technique – with clearly a swindle intention – a patchwork quilt of a model of the genetic substance of the idea of an influenza virus.”

The interviewer then asked how a layman could check this, to which he replied:

“About these short pieces of gene substance, which in the sense of genetics are not complete and which do not even suffice for defining a gene, it is being maintained that they together would make up the entire gene substance of an influenza virus.

“In order to see through this swindle, one only has to be able to add up the published length pieces in order to ascertain that the sum of the lengths of the individual pieces, which supposedly makes up the entire viral gene substance of the purported influenza virus, does not make up the … genome of the influenza virus model.

“Even simpler it is to ask in what publication you can find the electron microscope photo of this supposedly reconstructed virus. There is no such publication.”

In not dealing with either the bacterial infection or the role of aspirin in causing the 1918 deaths, and by continuing the “virulent virus myth,” the CDC is promoting the need for anti-viral drugs (which it mentions by name), as well as the development of vaccines, yet none of them would be appropriate for dealing with what killed people during 1918.

The CDC continues in its false promotion of 1918 deaths being flu related, and ignores common respiratory bacteria that NIAID showed was the source, and the global medical blunder of using toxic aspirin:

“Are current antivirals and vaccines effective against the 1918 virus?

“Yes. Two types of antiviral drugs, rimantadine (Flumadine) and oseltamivir (Tamiflu), have been shown to be effective against influenza viruses similar to the 1918 virus. Vaccines containing the 1918 HA or other subtype H1 HA proteins were effective in protecting mice against the 1918 virus. In fact, the current influenza vaccine provided some level of protection against the 1918 virus in mice.

“Are new prophylactics and therapeutics against the 1918 virus under way?

“The reconstruction of the 1918 virus will enable CDC to pursue development of a vaccine candidate reference virus that would provide optimal protection against this or similar viruses.”

The CDC’s characterization of 1918 as a time when a virulent virus threatened all humanity is patently untrue.  That false view was used by George Bush to engender terror that a new virulent virus – related to the 1918 virus – was going to occur and kill millions again.

Why does the CDC persist in this myth despite evidence to the contrary?   Eschewing motives, one might only suggest some effects of projecting the terrifying myth that millions of people could die from the virus:

…1.  Distraction from the hard reality that natural treatments were the only
……. effective treatments during 1918;

…2.  Cloaking of Bayer, aspirin and the industry’s role in the
……. deaths;

…3.  Sales of billions in anti-viral drugs and vaccine development;

…4.  Increased financial power to the pharmaceutical industry to control media
……. and influence government;

…5.  Increased illnesses and deaths from chemical pharmaceutical agents, one of
……. the highest risk factors;

…6.  Fearful dependence on “expert medical authority” and complex expensive
……. “solutions” to save people;

…7.  Surrender of unlimited authority to government regulatory agencies to
……. “protect” the public from natural products;  VIDEO

…8.  Use of the specter of millions of deaths as the justification for the
……. removal of human rights to “protect” the public;

…9.  Enhancement of the pharmaceutical industry moves toward an uncontested
……. global monopoly over health (life and death);

…10.  Industrialization, commercialization, and militarization of “disease”; and

…11.  An open door to use of “pandemic emergency” to justify martial law.

The truth — that medical authorities using Bayer aspirin (and generic aspirin) killed so many millions of people that those deaths became one the most terrifying events in human history — fundamentally threatens a global multi-trillion dollar investment industry built around unquestioned “medical expertise” and their use of synthetic drugs.

But the fuller truth contains something more dire for the pharmaceutical industry than “only” the millions of deaths they caused because something else of great significance happened then as well – non-industrial medicine, those using organic substances, saved people from death.

1918 set up a global test comparing millions of people, those who were treated by industrial medicine and those treated by organic medicine.  The first group died in unfathomable numbers.  Nearly all of the second group lived.

That reality shines out from 1918, focusing the world’s attention backwards historically to the rise of the synthetic chemical pharmaceutical industry where once humanity had only used nature.

What stands out is the failure and toxicity of one of the industry’s oldest and most trusted products – aspirin – to a calamitous degree. Add to that Bayer’s global advertising of its toxic product, and government and media influence, and they combined to increase the loss of life to a level never seen before.

Bayer’s product produced so many millions of deaths that it competes with the black plague in number of deaths – 20 to 50 million deaths during 1918 and 1919 versus 25 to 75 million during the course of many years of the Bubonic Plague.

But that single synthetic pharmaceutical product has by now far outstripped the number of deaths of the most infamous disease in history since, as a later section on Bayer will show, the deaths have not stopped even up to today and are of epidemic proportions.

Natural health practitioners are the ones who saved lives during 1918 while aspirin killed.  Today the government, under influence from Bayer and other pharmaceutical companies, is suppressing access to natural health products which have no lethality and saved lives during 1918, in favor of predictably lethal vaccines, the need for which is based on an extremely misdirecting myth – blaming a flu (or virus) that was not the cause.

Beyond the deaths Bayer caused with its aspirin, in the 1980s, it knowingly “sold millions of dollars of blood-clotting medicine for hemophiliacs – medicine that carried a high risk of transmitting AIDS,” reported the Sydney Morning Herald back in 2003.  The medicine was developed from HIV-infected plasma donors.  “As a result, thousands of hemophiliacs became infected with HIV,” CBS advised in 2009.  Here’s a less forgiving MSNBC news video on the matter.

In light of the millions of 1918 deaths from Bayer’s invention of aspirin (a coal tar-based synthetic) and now Bayer’s synthetic vaccines (potentially contaminated with anything), an automatic reassessment of natural versus synthetic treatments is triggered.

Life or death is at stake for humanity in that reassessment.

.

Bayer and Death Series:

Part 1:. 1918 and Aspirin
Part 2:. Aspirin Killed, Homeopathy Saved
Part 3:. Vaccines and CDC’s Myth of a 1918 Virus
Part 4:. Aspirin Deaths Continue Beyond 1918
Part 5:. A New Set of Questions about 1918