GM Biofuels: Another Planned Disaster


By Rady Ananda

Governments around the world have proposed biofuels, liquid fuels derived from plants, fungi or algae, as a solution to today’s energy and environmental crises. But this alternative is as bad as, or worse than, fossil fuels.

Reasons to reject biofuels include:

  • Loss of farmland for fuel land, increasing food prices and world hunger;
  • Deforestation and conversion of prairie to cropland, causing a net increase in greenhouse gases;
  • Increased reliance on eco-destructive pesticides; and
  • Proliferation of dangerous genetically modified crops.

ActionAid, I-SIS, and others, have produced in-depth reports linking biofuels to increased food prices, increased greenhouse gases thru land use changes, and loss of income for local communities.  

These reasons alone are sufficient to deem biofuels a poor alternative to fossil fuels. However, the last two bulleted items raise more grave concerns.

Genetically modified corn, cane, beet, and oil seeds like soy, rapeseed, and palm oil (among other biota) are used to produce biofuels. They require “intensive” chemical inputs with far-ranging consequences for humans, for Earth’s pollinators, and for the environment.

GM crops have been linked to organ damage and reproductive failure in mammals, and sudden death in plants. They are also linked to the catastrophic bee die-off occurring in the US and elsewhere.

GM crops contaminate natural species, destroy biodiversity and bankrupt farmers who then cannot sell to a No-GMO market. Biotech giants admit they cannot prevent contamination of natural fields.

Further, GM crops fail to yield as promised. “After more than 20 years of research and 13 years of commercialization,” the Union of Concerned Scientists reports, “we conclude that GE has done little to increase overall crop yields.” When promised yields didn’t materialize in India, many farmers – indeed, whole families – committed suicide.

The Organic Center found that “GE crops have been responsible for an increase of 383 million pounds of herbicide use” in the U.S. from 1996 thru 2008. Weed resistance to these chemicals has skyrocketed. Resistant horseweed, ragweed and pigweed are ruining fields.

Terrifying for the biosphere, pesticides cause mass die-offs. Yale Environment 360 noted that, “three new diseases have decimated populations of amphibians, honeybees, and — most recently — bats. Increasingly, scientists suspect that low-level exposure to pesticides could be contributing to this rash of epidemics.”

The 100-year experiment in chemical farming is a radical departure from 10,000 years of sustainable agriculture. Chemical farming has proven its failure to humanity and ecosystems. When chemical companies get into the ag business, they aim to sell chemicals. You know a tree by its fruit. Monsanto (Agent Orange, Vietnam), Dow (DDT, Bhopal), and Bayer (Zyklon B, Nazi camps) plan to increase the use of pesticides and biotechnology globally. They must be stopped.

If their history isn’t enough cause for alarm, these biotech firms suppress independent scientific study. In Nature Biotechnology, Emily Waltz noted that the industry’s “reluctance to share its products with scientists … is fueling the view that companies have something to hide.”

We can have little confidence in an industry that secretly foisted GM crops onto the world while banning independent investigation into potential harm. Waltz reports that so few papers turned up when one researcher reviewed the literature for toxicity studies on commercialized GM crops, that he asked, “Where is the scientific evidence showing that GM plants/food are toxicologically safe?”

A more logical and far saner and safer solution for the energy and environmental crises we face today is to develop programs that reduce energy consumption:

  • Expand mass transportation;
  • Buy local, and support community gardens and farmers markets;
  • Enable the four-day work week;
  • Restore public ownership of mass media which thrives on consumerism; and
  • End biotech subsidies.

We need to shift the entire Western culture toward living simply, in harmony with nature. Instead of developing dangerous alternative fuel sources, let’s focus on using less fuel.

One response to “GM Biofuels: Another Planned Disaster

  1. Updated May 6 to correct errata:

    Wheat is used for biofuels, but GM wheat has not yet been commercialized (altho it will be).

    Monsanto developed Agent Orange (dioxin) for defoliation in Vietnam and dumped it in various locations in the US, but not Love Canal.

    Further Sources:

    http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/01/21/2024202/Researchers-Pooh-Pooh-Algae-Based-Biofuel (h/t to smchris at BuzzFlash)

    EU biofuels significantly harming food production in developing countries, http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/15/biofuels-food-production-developing-countries

    The Trouble with Biofuel, http://baptizemeinwine.livejournal.com/7412.html

    The Case against Biofuels: Probing Ethanol’s Hidden Costs, http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2251

    Peak Soil: Why Cellulosic ethanol and other Biofuels are Not Sustainable and a Threat to America’s National Security (2007), http://www.energypulse.net/centers/article/article_display.cfm?a_id=1478 [h/t to 2truthy at Dissident Voice]

What do YOU think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s