Support Genetically Engineered Food “Right to Know” Legislation in Your State
Legislation that would require labels on genetically engineered salmon, milk, or other GE foods has been introduced this year in fourteen states across the country. Please take action if you live in one of the following states.
If your state hasn’t introduced a bill yet, take action here!
- Alaska HB 99 (description)
- California AB 88 (description)
- Connecticut HB 5868 (description)
- Hawaii HB 1534 (description)
- Illinois HB 1249 (description)
- Iowa HF 375 (description)
- Maryland HB 1261 (description)
- New York A01367 (description)
- North Carolina HB 446 (description)
- Oregon HB 3346 (description)
- Rhode Island H 5796 (description)
- Tennessee HB 1928 (description)
- Vermont H 123 (description)
- West Virginia HB 2178 (description)
Food Freedom 
This is nice and all but it doesn’t cover feed. I produce raw milk (just for us) but would love to see labeling for animal feeds as well.
If you are a producer, particularly a small one, how do you provide info that your feeds are non-GMO?
This is no easy thing to do in Tennessee.
that’s a good point, Kristin. In fact, I read that Mexico’s regular corn crops became contaminated with GMO seed from feed. Apparently they planted some of the feed.
There are orgs that certify products GM-free, but I don’t know the cost for that. One of them is the Non GMO Project
http://www.nongmoproject.org/
Pingback: The Progressive Mind » 14 States have GMO label bills: Call your State Reps | Food Freedom
Pingback: Lawsuit seeks to invalidate Monsanto’s GMO patents | COTO Report
Pingback: Lawsuit seeks to invalidate Monsanto’s GMO patents : Infowars Ireland
Pingback: The Progressive Mind » Lawsuit seeks to invalidate Monsanto’s GMO patents | Food Freedom
Pingback: Lawsuit seeks to invalidate Monsanto’s GMO patents :
Pingback: exohuman | Lawsuit Challenges Monsanto GMO Patents
Constantly mutating cancerous GMO pollen will metastasize and invade fields with natural blossoms. The stupid irony is that Monsanto can sue a non GMO grower if the former’s ‘invention’ is mixed in the latter’s seed cache. Makes sense? Not.
awl
The link to the CT bill is incorrect as it points to 05968. The correct link is:
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2011/TOB/H/2011HB-05868-R00-HB.htm
oh, thank you, Matt.
To clarify Rady, the non-GMO project allows .9% GMO contamination. I haven’t come across an official list of 100% GMO-free products.
So do you have any information on which of these bills passed and which failed? Which states have GMO labeling bills coming up in 2013?
Pingback: Lawsuit seeks to invalidate Monsanto’s GMO patents - Infowars Ireland